Tech Coast Review
The startup and tech news weblog for Southern California
Showing posts with label Social Networking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Networking. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Los Angeles Based Myspace is finally trying to catch back up on the innovation curve by releasing their apps platform today. These apps, much like the Facebook, apps, allow social widgets on your myspace profile. And while Facebook has beaten Myspace by almost a year with this functionality, there are some things to applaud Myspace over. Most of important of which is that they are the first container to go live with the much touted OpenSocial specs.

There are a number of apps that are live today (well over a hundred with more being added every moment). Here are a list of some of the cooler ones I played with:

  • Playlist.com
    Social Music Playlist that help you discover new music and broadcast it to your friends on your profile.
  • Flixter Movies
    Helps you discover movies by showing you what your friends thought.
  • Where I've Traveled
    Create an interactive world map, to show off all of the cities, states, and countries you've traveled to.
    (Incidentally this app is made by San Diego based Travature.com, a travel 2.0 company we'll probably review in the next couple of weeks).
  • Twitter Sync
    Sync your myspace mood status or other updates with twitter.
Overall, while I'm usually a Myspace hater, I'm actually impressed with how they came out of the gates here. While theres been pleanty of opensocial hype, myspace didn't send out big press releases about launching soon like some other containers, they just built the development community, got the apps working with opensocial and then just launched. Thats the way to do it. And at least for the moment, the apps not only work pretty well, they seem free of the facebook spam. Now thats a change, Myspace being solid, and better at spam then Facebook. We'll see how long this lasts.

Website: apps.myspace.com

Screenshot:

 

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Last week one of the bigger web 2.0ish conferences was in Southern California: The Oreilly Graphing Social Patterns, held in San Diego. I had some passing involvement there and after digesting it a bit, one of the things that I came across thinking was that it never ceeses to amaze me how traditional companies are clueless to what the social web is all about.

So many companies are not sure that they "get" social, but are being told by people in the know that they "need" social. What this often means to them seems to be two extremes: either you must be a company knee deep in community by becoming some up and coming niche social networking site (enter pitch for online community of garbage men here) or that social should just be haphazardly bolted onto the top of your existing product (your chair company makes a vampire biting facebook app that eats chairs). But clearly neither extreme is a way to add value to your product/service. And maybe even more importantly, social on its own, doesn't necessarily monitize.

What does add value AND monetizes, is the notion that social is the new and obvious enabler, of existing markets. Most business are not likely to fundamentally change by being social, they just become better at the business of connecting with and between customers. Movie sites like Blockbuster or Netflix are great examples of this. The companies are still fundamentally about movies, but social takes the customer experience to a different level because you can show off the movies you're watching, connect with friends who have similar taste in movies, review what you've seen so you get better suggestions for new movies, etc. Regardless of whether you are on one of their facebook or opensocial apps, or you are in the community section of their own site, the social graph has become a core enabler of movie watching. These activities enhance the entire video business because you now are not just watching the movie, but you also are stay engaged before and after. In this way community doesn't change the business, but instead drastically creates more value to the lifecyle of the business.

In this way as we move forward, social to me becomes less about being the next cornerstone block of a company, and more about being a fundamental component entrenched in nearly all online activity.

 

Friday, March 7, 2008

Social Vibe, recently closed over $4 Million in their series A funding round last month. They are located in Hollywood and have the two things every good web 2.0 start up needs; 1) a slick looking site and 2) a very interesting idea.

The main premise behind their idea is having users of Myspace and Facebook get their social networking pages sponsored and in return they get a chance to win prizes or give money to charities. You get points according to how active you are on a social network, how popular you are, and how many people you get to join the social vibe community. If you think about this for a second you will see that if you have a very active social vibe community it would be very very viral. Also on the plus side they did a good job of making the ads or "sponsorships" cool looking (ie they are not blinking banners for saying you are the 837,487 customer and have won and new laptop), and as a bonus they allow you to donate your points to charity.

I do reserve some questions for their business model the first being; why entries to win a prize? I get offers to enter contests for free all the time, whether it is dropping my business card in the free lunch bowl or the previously mentioned ad for my chance to win a laptop and I know one thing...I don't go near any of them. I realize that here the odds are better, but I do not like working for a chance to win a prize, I think it would be more motivating if this worked in a fashion where you can exchange your points for definitive prizes even if it would take longer to get to the good prizes. Or maybe an even more novel idea just let the people exchange their points for some cool hard cash (although I do realize this could be difficult to implement legally if minors wanted to use the service).

My next bone to pick is with the charities, people love all sorts of charities for different reasons whether it is Save the Whales or Safe Haven for Donkeys in the Holy Land (click the link I did not make that up). The point here is that people like charities for different reasons, I am sure Socialvibe knows exactly how much a point converts to monetarily so why not just let the user donate to whatever charity they desire. However I will admit that they do have a wide range of quality charities covered.

My overall impression here is that this could be huge, everything Social Vibe does looks slick and I could really see people adding these advertisements, widgets, and videos to their social network pages in order to gain a chance at some prizes. Furthermore if this does catch on and people are not as anti-raffle type contests as me the whole scheme is viral enough to spread all over the most popular social networks in no time at all.



 

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

We are not a big fan of Los Angeles based social network king, Myspace.  Sure they helped take the social network world to the mainstream and are now the incumbent player in the space, but in the fast paced tech world, they are (at least from an innovation perspective) constantly being surpassed by upstarts as well as their key competitor: Facebook. But yesterday, Myspace finally made some huge strides to regain some confidence, by releasing their developer API.  


While the results of the Myspace development platform to consumers won't be available until the first of March, developers can now get a head start building widgets and apps for the social network.  This of course is great news for both consumers who will get all kinds of cool extensions to their social graph (ala facebook apps), and also great for developers who will likely be able to build a whole ecosystem of easy to make apps with a giant user base ready to get their hands on them.  

While Myspace is late to the game in terms of opening up their platform, they seem to be doing a few things better then Facebook's earlier API release.  For one thing Myspace is basically building their API over the top of Google's Open Social, meaning that developers can fairly easily port their apps between most social network platforms.  This increased interoperability is not only a show of good faith, but also means more developers are likely to contribute, which is obviously good for everyone involved.  Besides OpenSocial, the other thing that Myspace seems to have a better leg on is helping developers monetize their apps.  Facebook is basically hands off in this case, and more then a few developers have made high trafficked apps that have return very little money for their efforts.  Myspace seems to have an eye to help developers out in this area, which again is good for everyone involved. 

Overall it seems Myspace is doing many things right with this move.  It'll be interesting to see how things go with the full consumer release next month.

 

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

I just ran across a video based social network company called stickam thats based out of LA.  What I found particularly amusing was the contraversy it caused a few months ago.  Stickam launched in 2006 as basicaly another myspace except it has live web cam functionality.   The streaming video is actually pretty cool, and lends itself to the myspace crowd quite well.  In fact particularly, at launch for the high school kids that weren't leaving Myspace for Facebook, there was a decent chunk that were leaving for Stickam.


Now here lies the problem, Stickam is owned by a parent company that also owns a few major porn sites.  Of course if you stop and think about it, it sort of make sense, who better to scale web cams to large social networking audiences, but porn site experts?  Clearly the issue here is the morality conflict that minors are likely the target demographic of Stickam, and obviously you want minors no where near the porn industry.  Though the truth is, besides a sort of handsoff relationship with the owner, its really hard to tell whether or not there is any real intermingling.  The New York Times article that originally broke the story, is mostly based off a disgruntled ex employee.  Obvisiously there was a bit of sensationalism, and its a hard call to know how big of an issue this really was.

In the few months since the NY Times article broke, Stickam's traffic has remained flat.  Did the article hamper the growth, or has the in crowd moved on to something else?  Is Stickam's chances of success done for?  Who knows, but I actually found watching people transfixed to the computer, while they were playing on stickam kind of interesting.  But then again, I'm not a minor, or a parent either.

 

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Los Angeles based Uber.com is yet another social network that tries to bring Myspace's artistic base in to the "uber-cool" web 2.o world.  Uber focuses on using the social graph to make your own website.  Which to me seems like doing nothing more then rewording customized profile page to make you think your getting something special.  


The one thing that would have been cool about Uber is the ability to bring in media from other social sources (such as youtube, flickr, etc) , which I guess you could use to create the ultimate aggregated website (profile) about yourself.  Unfortunately the way to do that wasn't particularly intuitive, and thus I'm left with nothing of interest to say about Uber.  Maybe the one surprise is that Uber some how seems to be gaining credible traffic (250K last month) despite the fact that no ones heard of it.  For the life of me, I can't figure out why they'd be gaining such decent traffic in such short time, so clearly someone sees something in Uber that I don't.  

 

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Los Angeles based Userplane, is an application service provider that specializes in web 2.0 chat and video. They were originally founded in 2001 and were purchased by AOL in 2006. Yesterday they announced at CES that they are now supporting the friendster API so Friendster widget developers can add chat support into their own apps. They also have released their own friendster app so users can have another audio and video chat option within the friendster directory.


While frankly, nobody cares much about Friendster, Userplane working to support them is probably part of a broader strategy of getting as diversified as possible with social networking support. Especially considering that OpenSocial (to which Userplane has already announced it will support) is still in a fledgling stage and may or may not become the ubiquitous social network standard that was so touted. Of course standard APIs and easy Data portability between social networks is what most every developer really wants. But until that dream is realized, Userplane is forging ahead on their own. They've done a good job on that front, considering they already do Myspace and Facebook and now they've added Friendster.

 

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Los Angeles based Geni (who we profiled here), has moved another step closer to being the Facebook for family social profiles. They essentially took the Facebook concept of the news feed (ya the one with all the controversy) and the Facebook timeline and put it in Geni.  Sure its nothing revolutionary, but it does continue to round out Genis service as a social network for people who aren't looking for a social network.  And although, many continue to think Geni's 100M valuation is high, we should remember that LinkedIn is valued a 250M and Geni is basically doing for family connection what LinkedIn has done with business contacts.  


I also feel that as long as the family news feed doesn't get to excessive it actually will be a more welcome feature then Facebooks feed.  Frankly besides the viral benefits of the Facebook newsfeed, I really don't care what my Facebook friends are doing.  If they are my friends in real life, I probably know, and if they aren't then I don't really care.  With Geni though, I might care, because half my family could be across the country or the world, so I might be removed, yet still interested in their day to day activities.  Their timeline feature is also potentially more useful then what you'd get on Facebook, because its more about scrap-booking.  I suppose as you get older, documenting different parts of yours life becomes important to you, and Geni timeline/scrapbook really fits that bill.

All in all more good stuff from Geni.

 

Monday, December 17, 2007

A Los Angeles based company has just announced the reception of an angel round of funding. TechCrunch reports that the funding is in at right around $750,000. The main idea of the company is to have not only book reviews but to base the book reviews (via social network) around friends.With the main premise that you would find a book review from a friend more useful than from a stranger.

The Good
There premise makes sense, in taking the time to read a book these days I couldn't care less what random people think about it, I would only take advice from friends, family, or just pick a book out of my own choosing. Secondly we all know the possibilities when 2 Stanford Graduates get together on an online project. In all seriousness there are some real good signs for this company; in around one year they have over 600,000 users and 10,000,000 book reviews, they are close to profitable, and best of all they have done all this without any formal funding.

The Bad
GoodReads has some stiff competition in Shelfari and Library Thing, and while I cannot claim that I am a member of any of these book networks I actually think that Shelfari looks a bit sleeker in terms of design. However that could easily be attributed to their association with Amazon and there plethora of funding. Also while I did find Goodreads easy to use I did not like seeing the reviews being pulled directly from a data base and having no personal oversight of this. What I mean by this is that you will have "Old Man and the Sea" reviews separated because some people are reviewing the paperback and others the hardcover even though they are the same book. What I found annoying about this is to get a good number of reviews you have to take the extra step of looking up 2 "different books" even though the story is identical.


The Overall

All in all GoodReads shows a whole lot of promise, they have accomplished more in one year without funding than many companies with years and millions. They are rapidly growing and I believe that if they use their funding wisely they will be in an excellent position to be the dominant book review social networking site.





 

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

It's the holiday season, which means family, family and more family.  

So what better way to keep track of all those nieces, nephews and second cousins once removed then with, Los Angeles based Geni.  

For those that haven't heard of Geni, basically its a place where you can map your family tree web 2.0 style.  Meaning that its essentially one big social network where when I can add my mom, dad, siblings and whatever, which then will email them an invite so they too will add others, to complete the family tree.  Obviously this is viral at its best.  

Geni, has been around since the beginning of this year and has been growing at a predictably strong rate (well over 5 million 10 million profiles).  They announced at the beginning of this week via their blog that they are starting to allow your family tree to be viewable publicly.  I definitely think this is a good move, because it starts allowing you to show connections outside of Geni (via other social networks like facebook, myspace or whatever).  Geni so far has done a good job with privacy, so until they start making big mistakes like Facebook, I think most people will like having the ability to make their family tree visible.

So far the only major thing that is concerning is the valuation Geni received.  It was well covered in the technosphere that with Geni's 10M in funding from Charles River Ventures, Geni ended up being valued at 100 Million.  BizOrigin sums up the concerns pretty well and the only thing I'd add is that I really hope that the kind of expectations levels that people will have on Geni doesn't kill it.  Sure Geni COULD map the entire worlds relations, and it COULD become worth its 1 Billion in gold, but it also can still be pretty cool without achieving that level, and I hope they are allowed other options then 1B or bust.

Regardless of the numbers though, Geni is just cool to use.  It's not going to replace Facebook for heavy social network users, but it just may well be the first social app that baby boomers and older types will latch on to.  It does have competitors (established ones like myheritage and ancestry plus up and commers like itsourtree), but I actually think that Geni is the best of the bunch.  At any rate, if nothing else, Geni will be a cool thing to show my gramps when I see him for Christmas. 


Screenshot:

 

Monday, December 10, 2007

Last week the LA Times and Mixx announced an alliance of sorts (Venture Beat), that while not necessarily revolutionary, adds interesting insight into the direction both old and new guard media are headed.  


As a recap for those not aware of Mixx, they are basically a Digg copy cat - a social media site where you vote for news items, articles, etc.     While Digg is the first and most dominant player in the category, they've been under a lot of fire as of late for allowing people to 'game' the system, and for various accusations of censorship.  This has opened the door for Mixx, a Virginia based company, that launched a private beta in September with 1.5M in first round funding.

The LA Times announcement is interesting for one thing because its another indication of major media realizing that their traditional model of delivery needs adjustment.  The LA Times has already been relatively progressive, especially compared to smaller outlets that sit on their thumbs preaching the old ways while their sales dwindle.  While the deal doesn't seem to add up to much more than a little Mixx icon at the bottom of LA Times articles, whats more telling is that the LA Times has chosen to invest in Mixx (the amount was not disclosed).  When one of the largest newspapers in the world chooses to invest in an online social media site, you know the weather is changing.    

For Mixx the announcement is an indication of how they plan to gain ground on Digg.  Mixx technologically speaking isn't really much different from Digg, so my initial impression with them when they launched a couple months ago, was that they didn't have anything largely noteworthy to convince people that they were better.  The LA Times deal, seems to point to a strategy of leaving the Digg model largely the same, but differentiate with better content.  This proves interesting, because while Digg is highly popular, it still largely just caters to the "tech" demographic.  Mixx, may break out the gates, by become the best social voting aggregator for actual news.  If that's true, this type of announcement is probably the first in a larger scale plan to integrate old guard news into Mixx and vice versa. 

 

Sunday, December 9, 2007

Buzznet, a social media network, originally founded in 2005, is certainly not a brand new startup, but this 3 year old Los Angeles based company is really beginning to take off. 


At its launch, Buzznet was really just a slightly more socialized version of Flickr, meaning thats it main focus seemed to be about sharing photos.  Since then Buzznet has transformed into a full on social networking platform and while it may not be as commonly known as Myspace or Facebook, its gaining some ground.  Nielsen ratings are putting Buzznet as one of the top 10 social media sites, with huge year over year growth.  Couple that with the announcement earlier this summer that Buzznet received it's second round of funding in the 6M range, partly from the same VC firm that has funded Myspace, and you've got a feeling these guys are on a good roll.

So what makes Buzznet so good?  Well for one thing it really does do most everything Myspace is doing only better.  Much like Myspace originally (and to some degree still is) focused specifically on music and media, Buzznet is now a general social networking site that sort of centers its community around artists and pop culture.  As opposed to the clean and simple look that Facebook takes or the clutter hell of Myspace, Buzznet is basically cool and sleek. It allows you to customize the look of your profile to a much higher degree then Facebook, but mostly manages to do it without looking as bad as Myspace.  Buzznet also has a deeper media interaction in its community than the likes of Myspace or Facebook because you can post things like photos, movies, audio, etc not just on your profile, but on other people's too (so as fan you could do things like create your own remix of your favorite band's song and post on their page).  

At the end of the day though, what makes us have the most faith in Buzznet is the adaptability they've shown.  They've evolved their site from a photo sharing community to a much more diversified social media platform.  If they continue their impressive growth, and management continues to show a pension for flexibility, they may be phased to take on the big boys soon.


Screenshot:


 

Monday, December 3, 2007

San Diego based startup Loopd.com has recently lanched as the "raddest sports social network ever".  Yes the tag line is lame, but we've got a bit of a soft spot for this startup.  Social Network me-toos are popping up everywhere, but Loopd has the potential to carve out a nice little niche.  The action sports industry has been experiencing rapid growth and while southern california may not be the tech powerhouse the valley is, it is the action sports hub.  Loopd is well located to bring in some great clients, and they have already brought in a respectable list that includes: Surfer Mag Hot100, PacSun, Oakley, and Monster Energy Drinks.  


Although Loopd isn't opened for anyone to create an action sports network (ala Ning, Flux, or Kickapps), they have much in common with these traditional whitelabel social networks.  When you create a user account, it is shared across the different Loopd Networks.  Meaning that their is a seamless transition between say the Surfer Hot100 Network and the PacSun Network.  This also means that each community can gain traction by the shared ecosystem; a general win-win for community building.  And while the shared base can be problematic for unrelated communities on Ning, it actually works real well within the related mix of action sports communities in Loopd.

From a user perspective, the Loopd experience is mostly quite nice.  It has an attractive and clean interface, that merges a good web2.0 social look with a "rad" action sports theme.  Creating an account was problematic at first when using Safari, but after another try, it was smooth sailing.  Loopd also performed quite fast, which was a nice change from some social networks (cough * myspace * cough).  
All that said, Loopd will have stiff competition from much bigger social networking platforms like Flux or Ning.  Particularly with the weight of Viacom behind Flux, one has to wonder if building a semi walled garden of action sports social communities, will be enough to keep Loopd's partners from moving to a larger, more general social network platform.  I for one hope not, but I wonder what Loopd will be able to offer it's content partners to keep them onboard.  

At the end of the day, if Loopd can successfully carve out a niche of bringing web 2.0 type social networking capabilities to the rapidly growing action sports industry, they might be one of those startups that end up being in the right place at the right time.

Website:

 

Monday, November 26, 2007

Fandango, a los angeles based company, is one of the largest online movie portals.  A few weeks ago it announced that it had integrated with the Facebook platform by supporting Facebook Pages.  

Unless you've been in a hole for the last few years, you are no doubt aware of the growing dominance Facebook has in the social networking realm.  With their support of Facebook apps beginning earlier this year, and now with their ad platform "Pages" that was rolled out earlier this month, companies are on a mad scramble to get in on the social graph train.  In general this is a good thing and connecting your entertainment activities with your friends online is a natural move, and one would think Facebook and Fandango would match well.  

But there is a problem, Fandango and Facebook maybe going too far with what they are integrating.  Privacy alarms are beginning to be ring, with Fandango's use of Facebook "beacons".  Essentially, if you purchase movie tickets through Fandango's website, that info gets posted to your Facebook profile for all to see. This was first covered at the Huffington Post and many across the Internet are beginning to report the same.   It seems obvious that while a few may like their activity automatically carried over,  many are going to be surprised to see what they are doing on a completely different website, showing up on the news stream on their "private" Facebook profile.  And while one side of me has to applaud the technical effort that Fandango and Facebook have done to get this kind of integration to work, the larger issue here is the implications of websites beginning to share your personal activity and how consumers are going to react to that.

 

Sponsored Ads